Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to UMH Properties, Inc.
How UMH Properties, Inc. stacks up
UMH · against 175 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
34/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #120 of 176 · scores higher than 30% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score25 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including UMH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 74% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.9% vs peer median 5.3%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.2% vs peer median 5.4%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.2% vs peer median 6.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UMH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UMH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | 0.8% | 2.9% | 31% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 158 reported | 5.2% | 6.1% | 31% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 167 reported | 7.2% | 5.9% | 61% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | 44.3% | 63.5% | 31% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UMH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | Unavailable | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 86M USD | 98 | 78 | |
| 4 | 255M USD | 96 | 71 | |
| 4 | 2.9B USD | 96 | 67 | |
| 118 | 850M USD | 35 | 24 | |
| 120 | 37.8B USD | 34 | 45 | |
| 120 | 6.7B USD | 34 | 28 | |
| 120 | 3.6B USD | 34 | 33 | |
| 120 | 1.3B USD | 34 | 43 | |
| 124 | 125.5B USD | 33 | 48 | |
| 124 | 859M USD | 33 | 55 | |
| 126 | 440M USD | 32 | 27 | |
| 126 | 13.9B USD | 32 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score