Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
UMH · against 662 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #435 of 663 · scores higher than 34% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score66 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including UMH · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
| Metric | UMH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 708 reported | 0.8% | 5.3% | 26% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 681 reported | 5.2% | 5.3% | 46% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 307 reported | 7.2% | 6.8% | 54% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 724 reported | 44.3% | 112.8% | 14% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 227M MYR (≈$50M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 394M HKD (≈$50M) | 99 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 435 | 3.6B USD | 34 | 33 | |
| 435 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 896M EUR (≈$986M) |
| 34 |
| 40 |
| 435 | 562M EUR (≈$618M) | 34 | 38 |
| 435 | 1.9B SGD (≈$1.4B) | 34 | 49 |
| 435 | 1.3B USD | 34 | 43 |
| 442 | 9.4B TWD (≈$291M) | 33 | 50 |
| 442 | 374.2B JPY (≈$2.5B) | 33 | 46 |
| 442 | 683.7B JPY (≈$4.6B) | 33 | 50 |
| 442 | 125.5B USD | 33 | 48 |