Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CCI · against 662 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #435 of 663 · scores higher than 34% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score66 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including CCI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
| Metric | CCI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 708 reported | 2.8% | 5.3% | 35% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 681 reported | 4.5% | 5.3% | 37% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 307 reported | 6.4% | 6.8% | 47% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 724 reported | -8.9% | 112.8% | 1% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 227M MYR (≈$50M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 394M HKD (≈$50M) | 99 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 428 | 45.0B JPY (≈$306M) | 35 | 40 | |
| 428 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 8.7B USD |
| 35 |
| 77 |
| 428 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 35 | 30 |
| 428 | 850M USD | 35 | 24 |
| 435 | 37.8B USD | 34 | 45 |
| 435 | 6.7B USD | 34 | 28 |
| 435 | 3.6B USD | 34 | 33 |
| 435 | 896M EUR (≈$986M) | 34 | 40 |
| 435 | 562M EUR (≈$618M) | 34 | 38 |