Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to BrightSpire Capital, Inc.
How BrightSpire Capital, Inc. stacks up
BRSP · against 662 other Real Estate companies
Valuation
32/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #448 of 663 · scores higher than 32% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score66 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including BRSP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 32?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -6.1% vs peer median 5.3%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.7% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BRSP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BRSP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 708 reported | -6.9% | 5.3% | 12% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 681 reported | 5.7% | 5.3% | 56% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 307 reported | 19.4% | 6.8% | 85% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 724 reported | 195.6% | 112.8% | 77% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BRSP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 227M MYR (≈$50M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 394M HKD (≈$50M) | 99 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 442 | 859M USD | 33 | 55 | |
| 442 | 1.0B SGD (≈$782M) | 33 | 53 | |
| 448 | 3.2B HKD (≈$415M) | 32 | 29 | |
| 448 | 66.3B JPY (≈$451M) | 32 | 42 | |
| 448 | 440M USD | 32 | 27 | |
| 448 | 18.1B SGD (≈$13.8B) | 32 | 55 | |
| 448 | 13.9B USD | 32 | 43 | |
| 448 | 11.0B DKK (≈$1.7B) | 32 | 49 | |
| 448 | 795M USD | 32 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score