Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BRSP · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #536 of 751 · scores higher than 29% of peers · safety percentile 29
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including BRSP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BRSP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 3.01× | 0.82× | 8% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 1.38 | 0.69 | 10% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 12.94× | 1.20× | 98% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 532 | 1.2B GBP (≈$1.6B) | 29 | 43 | |
| 533 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 15.7B USD |
| 29 |
| 48 |
| 534 | 7.1B CNY (≈$998M) | 29 | 11 |
| 535 | 3.4B CAD (≈$2.5B) | 29 | 39 |
| 536 | 440M USD | 29 | 27 |
| 537 | 4.8B CAD (≈$3.5B) | 29 | 35 |
| 538 | 1.9B CAD (≈$1.4B) | 28 | 27 |
| 539 | 1.5B AUD (≈$1.0B) | 28 | 50 |
| 540 | 816M EUR (≈$898M) | 28 | 56 |