Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MRP · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #2 of 751 · scores higher than 100% of peers · safety percentile 100
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)76 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including MRP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MRP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 0.43× | 0.82× | 76% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | Not reported | 0.69 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 46.57× | 1.20× | 99% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 6 | 305M MYR (≈$67M) | 99 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score