Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
How Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. stacks up
TCI · against 179 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Growth
55/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #90 of 180 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score17 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including TCI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 55?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.6% vs peer median 3.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.3% vs peer median 3.0%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 20.2% vs peer median 11.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TCI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TCI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 182 reported | 5.3% | 5.9% | 46% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 133 reported | 20.2% | 13.9% | 54% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 174 reported | 3.6% | 4.8% | 45% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TCI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 3 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 4 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 4 | 34.7B USD | 98 | 45 | |
| 87 | 9.0B USD | 59 | 52 | |
| 88 | 15.9B USD | 57 | 49 | |
| 88 | 1.3B USD | 57 | 43 | |
| 90 | 68.1B USD | 55 | 33 | |
| 90 | 435M USD | 55 | 43 | |
| 92 | 16.8B USD | 54 | 46 | |
| 93 | 37.8B USD | 53 | 45 | |
| 93 | 3.8B USD | 53 | 55 | |
| 93 | 5.3B USD | 53 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score