Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
How Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. stacks up
TCI · against 730 other Real Estate companies
Growth
55/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #326 of 731 · scores higher than 55% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score73 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including TCI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 55?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.6% vs peer median 3.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.3% vs peer median 3.0%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 20.2% vs peer median 11.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TCI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TCI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 741 reported | 5.3% | 3.0% | 59% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 464 reported | 20.2% | 11.1% | 60% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 718 reported | 3.6% | 3.8% | 49% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TCI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 65.5B INR (≈$786M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 6.3B THB (≈$176M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 5 | 3.1B CNY (≈$440M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 326 | 68.1B USD | 55 | 33 | |
| 326 | 83.6B SEK (≈$8.4B) | 55 | 47 | |
| 326 | 12.3B GBP (≈$16.0B) | 55 | 41 | |
| 326 | 49.88T IDR (≈$3.1B) | 55 | 57 | |
| 326 | 435M USD | 55 | 43 | |
| 326 | 2.9B SEK (≈$289M) | 55 | 48 | |
| 326 | 3.9B SGD (≈$3.0B) | 55 | 63 | |
| 334 | 139.5B JPY (≈$949M) | 54 | 81 | |
| 334 | 19.0B SAR (≈$5.1B) | 54 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score