Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lamar Advertising Company
How Lamar Advertising Company stacks up
LAMR · against 730 other Real Estate companies
Growth
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #312 of 731 · scores higher than 57% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score73 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including LAMR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.9% vs peer median 3.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.4% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 66% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 26.6% vs peer median 11.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LAMR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LAMR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 741 reported | 4.4% | 3.0% | 55% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 464 reported | 26.6% | 11.1% | 66% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 718 reported | 3.9% | 3.8% | 50% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LAMR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 65.5B INR (≈$786M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 6.3B THB (≈$176M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 5 | 3.1B CNY (≈$440M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 304 | 572M EUR (≈$629M) | 58 | 63 | |
| 312 | 1.8B AUD (≈$1.2B) | 57 | 51 | |
| 312 | 2.5B BRL (≈$449M) | 57 | 70 | |
| 312 | 6.7B EUR (≈$7.3B) | 57 | 51 | |
| 312 | 15.9B USD | 57 | 49 | |
| 312 | 12.33T IDR (≈$764M) | 57 | 85 | |
| 312 | 4.0B SGD (≈$3.1B) | 57 | 52 | |
| 312 | 1.3B USD | 57 | 43 | |
| 319 | 1.10T JPY (≈$7.5B) | 56 | 82 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score