Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Adamas Trust, Inc.
How Adamas Trust, Inc. stacks up
ADAM · against 730 other Real Estate companies
Growth
99/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #5 of 731 · scores higher than 99% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score77 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including ADAM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 99?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 92% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 226.7% vs peer median 11.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 94% of peers. Revenue growth: 47.7% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 100% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 243.7% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ADAM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ADAM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 741 reported | 47.7% | 3.0% | 94% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 464 reported | 226.7% | 11.1% | 92% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 718 reported | 243.7% | 3.8% | 100% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ADAM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 65.5B INR (≈$786M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 6.3B THB (≈$176M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 5 | 3.1B CNY (≈$440M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 5 | 71.4B JPY (≈$486M) | 99 | 73 | |
| 5 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 5 | 7.60T CLP (≈$8.4B) | 99 | 86 | |
| 5 | 2.4B BRL (≈$428M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 10 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 98 | 55 | |
| 10 | 4.7B HKD (≈$597M) | 98 | 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score