Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Kimco Realty Corporation
How Kimco Realty Corporation stacks up
KIM · against 730 other Real Estate companies
Growth
54/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #334 of 731 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score73 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including KIM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 3.5% vs peer median 11.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.4% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 64% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 7.5% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KIM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KIM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 741 reported | 4.4% | 3.0% | 55% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 464 reported | 3.5% | 11.1% | 41% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 718 reported | 7.5% | 3.8% | 64% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KIM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 65.5B INR (≈$786M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 6.3B THB (≈$176M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 5 | 3.1B CNY (≈$440M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 334 | 139.5B JPY (≈$949M) | 54 | 81 | |
| 334 | 19.0B SAR (≈$5.1B) | 54 | 61 | |
| 334 | 4.28T JPY (≈$29.1B) | 54 | 47 | |
| 334 | 84.7B JPY (≈$576M) | 54 | 50 | |
| 334 | 16.8B USD | 54 | 46 | |
| 334 | 1.5B NZD (≈$896M) | 54 | 74 | |
| 334 | 5.0B SEK (≈$504M) | 54 | 47 | |
| 341 | 1.7B EUR (≈$1.9B) | 53 | 55 | |
| 341 | 37.8B USD | 53 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score