Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
KIM · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #489 of 751 · scores higher than 35% of peers · safety percentile 35
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including KIM · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | KIM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 0.85× | 0.82× | 47% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 0.96 | 0.69 | 29% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 0.97× | 1.20× | 39% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 485 | 1.2B EUR (≈$1.3B) | 35 | 45 | |
| 486 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 704M HKD (≈$90M) |
| 35 |
| 49 |
| 487 | 4.1B SEK (≈$412M) | 35 | 67 |
| 488 | 12.3B GBP (≈$16.0B) | 35 | 41 |
| 489 | 16.8B USD | 35 | 46 |
| 490 | 21.5B SEK (≈$2.1B) | 35 | 51 |
| 491 | 16.5B THB (≈$461M) | 35 | 45 |
| 492 | 26.3B USD | 35 | 41 |
| 493 | 6.1B EUR (≈$6.7B) | 34 | 48 |