Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
KIM · against 662 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #356 of 663 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score66 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including KIM · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
| Metric | KIM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 708 reported | 3.4% | 5.3% | 38% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 681 reported | 5.3% | 5.3% | 50% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 307 reported | 7.0% | 6.8% | 53% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 724 reported | 61.3% | 112.8% | 22% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 227M MYR (≈$50M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 394M HKD (≈$50M) | 99 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 356 | 6.3B CNY (≈$876M) | 46 | 50 | |
| 356 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 59.8B JPY (≈$406M) |
| 46 |
| 80 |
| 356 | 4.28T JPY (≈$29.1B) | 46 | 47 |
| 356 | 477.5B JPY (≈$3.2B) | 46 | 42 |
| 356 | 16.8B USD | 46 | 46 |
| 356 | 7.4B USD | 46 | 53 |
| 362 | 146.6B JPY (≈$997M) | 45 | 54 |
| 362 | 439M USD | 45 | 43 |
| 362 | 13.5B SEK (≈$1.3B) | 45 | 37 |