Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to The J. M. Smucker Company
How The J. M. Smucker Company stacks up
SJM · against 88 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Valuation
40/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #54 of 89 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score15 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including SJM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 40?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 75% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.7% vs peer median 4.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 63% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.8% vs peer median 8.7%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 76% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 11.6% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SJM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SJM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 86 reported | 1.7% | 4.3% | 13% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 89 reported | 10.9% | 8.8% | 74% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 36 reported | 11.6% | 6.7% | 89% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 85 reported | 42.1% | 40.9% | 54% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SJM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56.3B HKD (≈$7.2B) | 95 | 71 | |
| 2 | 7.2B USD | 92 | 72 | |
| 3 | 9.3B EUR (≈$10.2B) | 87 | 36 | |
| 3 | 7.8B USD | 87 | 83 | |
| 5 | 379.9B MXN (≈$20.5B) | 84 | 68 | |
| 52 | 55.6B CNY (≈$7.8B) | 41 | 57 | |
| 52 | 15.2B USD | 41 | 36 | |
| 54 | 13.8B USD | 40 | 59 | |
| 54 | 20.5B CAD (≈$15.0B) | 40 | 48 | |
| 54 | 13.7B USD | 40 | 46 | |
| 57 | 11.3B USD | 39 | 35 | |
| 57 | 13.7B USD | 39 | 51 | |
| 59 | 9.8B EUR (≈$10.7B) | 38 | 36 | |
| 59 | 7.5B USD | 38 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score