Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PFGC · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #468 of 799 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score80 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including PFGC · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Defensive norm.
| Metric | PFGC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | 2.4% | 4.5% | 30% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | 7.4% | 8.9% | 40% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | 6.7% | 6.3% | 53% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | 32.5% | 54.4% | 27% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 468 | 11.5B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 41 | 44 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 468 |
| 287.6B BRL (≈$51.8B) |
| 41 |
| 39 |
| 468 | 1.3B AUD (≈$887M) | 41 | 37 |
| 468 | 37.1B USD | 41 | 48 |
| 468 | 15.2B USD | 41 | 36 |
| 476 | 8.97T KRW (≈$6.5B) | 40 | 38 |
| 476 | 3.5B SAR (≈$938M) | 40 | 24 |
| 476 | 9.6B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 40 | 53 |
| 476 | 50.3B INR (≈$604M) | 40 | 77 |