Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to The J. M. Smucker Company
How The J. M. Smucker Company stacks up
SJM · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Valuation
40/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #476 of 799 · scores higher than 40% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score80 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including SJM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 40?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 75% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.7% vs peer median 4.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 63% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.8% vs peer median 8.7%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 76% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 11.6% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SJM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SJM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | 1.7% | 4.5% | 25% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | 10.9% | 8.9% | 63% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | 11.6% | 6.3% | 76% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | 42.1% | 54.4% | 39% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SJM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 476 | 9.6B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 40 | 53 | |
| 476 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score