Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to The J. M. Smucker Company
How The J. M. Smucker Company stacks up
SJM · against 806 other Consumer Defensive companies
Growth
77/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #183 of 807 · scores higher than 77% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score80 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including SJM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 77?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 62% of peers. Revenue growth: 5.1% vs peer median 2.8%
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 1.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SJM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SJM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 813 reported | 5.1% | 2.8% | 62% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 595 reported | Not reported | 1.4% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 801 reported | 2.7% | 3.7% | 45% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SJM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 945M EUR (≈$1.0B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 30.7B BRL (≈$5.5B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 5.5B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 82.5B JPY (≈$561M) | 99 | 69 | |
| 4 | 2.4B CNY (≈$329M) | 99 | 29 | |
| 183 | 6.0B CNY (≈$835M) | 77 | 22 | |
| 183 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score