Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Primo Brands Corporation
How Primo Brands Corporation stacks up
PRMB · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Valuation
38/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #492 of 799 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score80 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including PRMB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 38?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 76% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.3% vs peer median 4.5%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 67% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.9% vs peer median 6.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 9.0% vs peer median 8.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PRMB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PRMB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | 1.5% | 4.5% | 24% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | 10.4% | 8.9% | 60% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | 4.0% | 6.3% | 33% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | 39.9% | 54.4% | 37% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PRMB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 492 | 25.6B CNY (≈$3.6B) | 38 | 41 | |
| 492 | 1.9B AUD (≈$1.3B) | 38 | 40 | |
| 492 | 49.0B USD | 38 | 49 | |
| 492 | 9.8B EUR (≈$10.7B) | 38 | 36 | |
| 492 | 7.5B USD | 38 | 43 | |
| 500 | 1.68T JPY (≈$11.4B) | 37 | 64 | |
| 500 | 3.5B CNY (≈$490M) | 37 | 60 | |
| 500 | 3.41T JPY (≈$23.2B) | 37 | 58 | |
| 500 | 1.85T CNY (≈$259.0B) | 37 | 71 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score