Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PRMB · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #732 of 802 · scores higher than 9% of peers · safety percentile 9
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)81 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including PRMB · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PRMB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 1.91× | 0.44× | 9% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 0.71 | 0.32 | 15% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 1.05× | 1.53× | 26% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 728 | 187.1B USD | 9 | 54 | |
| 729 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 3.8B CAD (≈$2.8B) |
| 9 |
| 31 |
| 730 | 2.4B CNY (≈$329M) | 9 | 29 |
| 731 | 238M SAR (≈$64M) | 9 | 3 |
| 732 | 7.5B USD | 9 | 43 |
| 733 | 48.8B AUD (≈$32.2B) | 9 | 29 |
| 734 | 217.1B CHF (≈$249.7B) | 8 | 35 |
| 735 | 2.7B GBP (≈$3.5B) | 8 | 17 |
| 736 | 2.82T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 8 | 46 |