Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
COKE · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #484 of 799 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score80 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including COKE · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its free cash flow yield, which is weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
| Metric | COKE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | 3.7% | 4.5% | 41% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | 7.5% | 8.9% | 41% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | 4.7% | 6.3% | 38% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | -3.6% | 54.4% | 1% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 484 | 6.9B TWD (≈$213M) | 39 | 24 | |
| 484 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 698.1B JPY (≈$4.7B) |
| 39 |
| 35 |
| 484 | 4.5B CNY (≈$634M) | 39 | 42 |
| 484 | 11.3B USD | 39 | 35 |
| 484 | 13.7B USD | 39 | 51 |
| 484 | 244M USD | 39 | 21 |
| 484 | 3.9B USD | 39 | 64 |
| 484 | 384M EUR (≈$422M) | 39 | 35 |
| 492 | 2.1B CNY (≈$289M) | 38 | 37 |