Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to PPL Corporation
How PPL Corporation stacks up
PPL · against 57 other Utilities companies of similar size
Valuation
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #29 of 58 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score15 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including PPL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Its metrics sit close to the Utilities norm.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -7.4% vs peer median 0.0%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.8% vs peer median 8.6%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.7% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PPL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PPL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 58 reported | 4.7% | 4.7% | 49% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 58 reported | 8.1% | 7.7% | 54% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 37 reported | -7.4% | -4.4% | 25% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 57 reported | 56.0% | 47.8% | 66% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PPL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.6B USD | 93 | 57 | |
| 2 | 22.9B USD | 91 | 66 | |
| 3 | 1.22T INR (≈$14.7B) | 83 | 65 | |
| 4 | 2.96T JPY (≈$20.1B) | 82 | 48 | |
| 5 | 27.0B EUR (≈$29.7B) | 76 | 63 | |
| 26 | 46.9B USD | 44 | 45 | |
| 27 | 21.0B AUD (≈$13.8B) | 43 | 50 | |
| 28 | 11.3B GBP (≈$14.7B) | 42 | 66 | |
| 29 | 21.4B USD | 41 | 46 | |
| 29 | 26.9B USD | 41 | 50 | |
| 29 | 20.7B EUR (≈$22.7B) | 41 | 48 | |
| 32 | 15.4B USD | 40 | 54 | |
| 32 | 36.3B USD | 40 | 51 | |
| 34 | 30.6B USD | 39 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score