Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Emera Incorporated
How Emera Incorporated stacks up
EMA · against 358 other Utilities companies
Valuation
40/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #215 of 359 · scores higher than 40% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score36 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including EMA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 40?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Its metrics sit close to the Utilities norm.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -5.3% vs peer median 0.0%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.8% vs peer median 8.6%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.4% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EMA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EMA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 356 reported | 4.4% | 5.0% | 42% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 7.8% | 8.6% | 41% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 164 reported | -5.3% | -1.8% | 33% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 341 reported | 61.2% | 64.7% | 47% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EMA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.8B BRL (≈$497M) | 100 | 69 | |
| 1 | 32.24T IDR (≈$2.0B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 3 | 55.0B HKD (≈$7.0B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 6.8B CNY (≈$945M) | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 211 | 26.9B USD | 41 | 50 | |
| 211 | 20.7B EUR (≈$22.7B) | 41 | 48 | |
| 211 | 6.4B USD | 41 | 45 | |
| 215 | 20.1B THB (≈$562M) | 40 | 23 | |
| 215 | 15.4B USD | 40 | 54 | |
| 215 | 36.3B USD | 40 | 51 | |
| 218 | 404.9B JPY (≈$2.8B) | 39 | 21 | |
| 218 | 30.6B USD | 39 | 47 | |
| 218 | 27.9B USD | 39 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score