Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
KEP · against 358 other Utilities companies
Ranked #25 of 359 · scores higher than 93% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score38 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including KEP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Utilities peers.
| Metric | KEP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 356 reported | 42.5% | 5.0% | 99% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 17.1% | 8.6% | 92% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 164 reported | 7.9% | -1.8% | 77% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 341 reported | 260.4% | 64.7% | 96% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.8B BRL (≈$497M) | 100 | 69 | |
| 1 | 32.24T IDR (≈$2.0B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 3 | 55.0B HKD (≈$7.0B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 6.8B CNY (≈$945M) | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 21 | 11.5B BRL (≈$2.1B) | 94 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 78 |
| 21 | 4.84T CLP (≈$5.3B) | 94 | 72 |
| 25 | 10.4B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 93 | 58 |
| 25 | 4.4B CNY (≈$613M) | 93 | 88 |
| 25 | 13.6B USD | 93 | 57 |
| 28 | 13.3B HKD (≈$1.7B) | 92 | 55 |
| 28 | 1.5B USD | 92 | 93 |
| 28 | 48.0B BRL (≈$8.6B) | 92 | 76 |
| 28 | 2.00T CLP (≈$2.2B) | 92 | 78 |