Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Edison International
How Edison International stacks up
EIX · against 358 other Utilities companies
Valuation
91/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #32 of 359 · scores higher than 91% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score38 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including EIX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 91?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Utilities peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -1.7% vs peer median 0.0%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 81% of peers. EBITDA yield: 14.9% vs peer median 8.6%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 95% of peers. Earnings yield: 16.3% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EIX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EIX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 356 reported | 16.3% | 5.0% | 95% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 13.2% | 8.6% | 81% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 164 reported | -1.7% | -1.8% | 50% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 341 reported | 76.0% | 64.7% | 60% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EIX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.8B BRL (≈$497M) | 100 | 69 | |
| 1 | 32.24T IDR (≈$2.0B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 3 | 55.0B HKD (≈$7.0B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 6.8B CNY (≈$945M) | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 28 | 1.5B USD | 92 | 93 | |
| 28 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score