Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to OneWater Marine Inc.
How OneWater Marine Inc. stacks up
ONEW · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
48/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #218 of 356 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score38 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including ONEW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.4% vs peer median 4.3%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.6% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ONEW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ONEW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 5.6% | 5.9% | 49% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | Not reported | 6.2% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 2.4% | 4.1% | 40% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ONEW| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 211 | 1.5B USD | 49 | 44 | |
| 211 | 1.4B USD | 49 | 38 | |
| 218 | 8.6B USD | 48 | 55 | |
| 218 | 2.4B USD | 48 | 65 | |
| 218 | 168M USD | 48 | 41 | |
| 218 | 2.6B USD | 48 | 49 | |
| 222 | 4.0B USD | 47 | 64 | |
| 222 | 12.2B USD | 47 | 60 | |
| 222 | 4.4B USD | 47 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score