Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Dorman Products, Inc.
How Dorman Products, Inc. stacks up
DORM · against 1,585 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Growth
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #834 of 1,586 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score158 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including DORM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -0.1% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.3% vs peer median 3.7%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.0% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DORM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DORM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 3.3% | 3.7% | 48% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,125 reported | -0.1% | 4.1% | 45% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,578 reported | 5.0% | 4.3% | 53% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DORM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 241M MYR (≈$53M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 834 | 29.9B CNY (≈$4.2B) | 47 | 67 | |
| 834 | 4.4B CNY (≈$616M) | 47 | 49 | |
| 834 | 3.3B CNY (≈$462M) | 47 | 28 | |
| 834 | 2.0B CNY (≈$284M) | 47 | 64 | |
| 834 | 4.0B USD | 47 | 64 | |
| 834 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 47 | 49 | |
| 834 | 12.2B USD | 47 | 60 | |
| 834 | 374M EUR (≈$412M) | 47 | 66 | |
| 834 | 7.16T IDR (≈$444M) | 47 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score