Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DORM · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #816 of 1,553 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including DORM · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
| Metric | DORM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 5.1% | 4.4% | 57% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 9.5% | 8.8% | 55% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 5.3% | 6.1% | 46% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 37.5% | 57.2% | 35% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 816 | 4.7B CNY (≈$663M) | 47 | 75 | |
| 816 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 113.0B JPY (≈$769M) |
| 47 |
| 74 |
| 816 | 4.0B USD | 47 | 62 |
| 816 | 5.9B USD | 47 | 39 |
| 816 | 4.0B USD | 47 | 64 |
| 816 | 283.2B SEK (≈$28.3B) | 47 | 41 |
| 816 | 255M USD | 47 | 35 |
| 816 | 1.0B BRL (≈$186M) | 47 | 32 |
| 816 | 4.6B USD | 47 | 39 |