Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Autoliv, Inc.
How Autoliv, Inc. stacks up
ALV · against 1,585 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Growth
48/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #818 of 1,586 · scores higher than 48% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score158 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including ALV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -5.7% vs peer median 4.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.3% vs peer median 4.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.9% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ALV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ALV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 5.9% | 3.7% | 60% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,125 reported | -5.7% | 4.1% | 40% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,578 reported | 4.3% | 4.3% | 50% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ALV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 241M MYR (≈$53M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 802 | 22.1B SEK (≈$2.2B) | 49 | 52 | |
| 818 | 4.9B CNY (≈$689M) | 48 | 51 | |
| 818 | 17.0B MYR (≈$3.7B) | 48 | 58 | |
| 818 | 53.9B JPY (≈$366M) | 48 | 79 | |
| 818 | 8.6B USD | 48 | 55 | |
| 818 | 15.47T IDR (≈$959M) | 48 | 65 | |
| 818 | 241M AUD (≈$159M) | 48 | 25 | |
| 818 | 2.4B USD | 48 | 65 | |
| 818 | 2.6B EUR (≈$2.9B) | 48 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score