Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LANDO · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #406 of 751 · scores higher than 46% of peers · safety percentile 46
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including LANDO · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LANDO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 0.72× | 0.82× | 56% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 1.08 | 0.69 | 21% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 1.66× | 1.20× | 64% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 402 | 338M EUR (≈$371M) | 47 | 53 | |
| 403 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 7.4B USD |
| 46 |
| 53 |
| 404 | 11.7B AUD (≈$7.8B) | 46 | 58 |
| 405 | 1.5B AUD (≈$974M) | 46 | 58 |
| 406 | Unavailable | 46 | 37 |
| 407 | 1.8B GBP (≈$2.4B) | 46 | 49 |
| 408 | 2.5B GBP (≈$3.3B) | 46 | 44 |
| 409 | 6.1B SGD (≈$4.7B) | 46 | 44 |
| 410 | 3.58T CLP (≈$3.9B) | 45 | 66 |