Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
STAG · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #403 of 751 · scores higher than 46% of peers · safety percentile 46
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including STAG · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | STAG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 0.94× | 0.82× | 42% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 0.96 | 0.69 | 29% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 1.82× | 1.20× | 70% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 399 | 574M HKD (≈$73M) | 47 | 42 | |
| 400 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 135.9B MXN (≈$7.3B) |
| 47 |
| 76 |
| 401 | 350M EUR (≈$385M) | 47 | 58 |
| 402 | 338M EUR (≈$371M) | 47 | 53 |
| 403 | 7.4B USD | 46 | 53 |
| 404 | 11.7B AUD (≈$7.8B) | 46 | 58 |
| 405 | 1.5B AUD (≈$974M) | 46 | 58 |
| 406 | Unavailable | 46 | 37 |
| 407 | 1.8B GBP (≈$2.4B) | 46 | 49 |