Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Gladstone Land Corporation
How Gladstone Land Corporation stacks up
LANDO · against 759 other Real Estate companies
Profitability
34/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #499 of 760 · scores higher than 34% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score76 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including LANDO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 68% of peers. Return on assets: 1.1% vs peer median 2.1%
- Return on invested capital is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 27.8% vs peer median 26.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LANDO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LANDO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 739 reported | Not reported | 3.4% | — | — | 33% |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 728 reported | 27.8% | 26.8% | 51% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 741 reported | 1.1% | 2.1% | 32% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 721 reported | -1.0% | 5.2% | 21% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 763 reported | 71.7% | 53.9% | 73% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LANDOScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score