Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Super Hi International Holding Ltd.
How Super Hi International Holding Ltd. stacks up
HDL · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #552 of 1,553 · scores higher than 64% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including HDL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 75% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.1% vs peer median 4.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 67% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 5.3% vs peer median 6.1%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 82% of peers. EBITDA yield: 15.2% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HDL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HDL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 1.0% | 4.4% | 25% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 15.2% | 8.8% | 82% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 9.4% | 6.1% | 67% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 61.5% | 57.2% | 53% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HDL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 552 | 41.7B JPY (≈$284M) | 64 | 70 | |
| 552 | 914M USD | 64 | 44 | |
| 552 | 13.5B USD | 64 | 62 | |
| 552 | 4.4B USD | 64 | 49 | |
| 552 | 582M USD | 64 | 63 | |
| 552 | 5.7B USD | 64 | 77 | |
| 552 | 1.6B INR (≈$19M) | 64 | 45 | |
| 552 | 2.9B HKD (≈$366M) | 64 | 40 | |
| 552 | 627M CAD (≈$458M) | 64 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score