Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HDL · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #465 of 1,585 · scores higher than 71% of peers · safety percentile 71
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)159 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including HDL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | HDL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 0.59× | 0.50× | 45% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 0.55 | 0.56 | 51% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 2.50× | 1.48× | 80% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 461 | 715M SEK (≈$71M) | 71 | 63 | |
| 462 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 17.6B JPY (≈$120M) |
| 71 |
| 83 |
| 463 | 1.2B USD | 71 | 54 |
| 464 | 73.8B EUR (≈$81.2B) | 71 | 58 |
| 465 | 582M USD | 71 | 63 |
| 466 | 423.5B INR (≈$5.1B) | 71 | 55 |
| 467 | 201.0B KRW (≈$145M) | 71 | 81 |
| 468 | 14.8B TWD (≈$459M) | 71 | 44 |
| 469 | 13.2B SEK (≈$1.3B) | 70 | 78 |