Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Dream Finders Homes, Inc.
How Dream Finders Homes, Inc. stacks up
DFH · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #552 of 1,553 · scores higher than 64% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including DFH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -17.5% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.5% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 95% of peers. Earnings yield: 15.9% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DFH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DFH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 14.1% | 4.4% | 95% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 7.5% | 8.8% | 43% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | -17.7% | 6.1% | 5% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 155.9% | 57.2% | 87% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DFH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 552 | 252.6B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 64 | 36 | |
| 552 | 3.5B CNY (≈$496M) | 64 | 54 | |
| 552 | 2.8B CNY (≈$395M) | 64 | 75 | |
| 552 | 41.7B JPY (≈$284M) | 64 | 70 | |
| 552 | 914M USD | 64 | 44 | |
| 552 | 13.5B USD | 64 | 62 | |
| 552 | 4.4B USD | 64 | 49 | |
| 552 | 582M USD | 64 | 63 | |
| 552 | 5.7B USD | 64 | 77 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score