Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Super Group (SGHC) Limited
How Super Group (SGHC) Limited stacks up
SGHC · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #552 of 1,553 · scores higher than 64% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including SGHC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 63% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.1% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 68% of peers. Earnings yield: 6.4% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SGHC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SGHC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 6.4% | 4.4% | 68% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 11.1% | 8.8% | 63% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | Not reported | 6.1% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 14.6% | 57.2% | 12% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SGHC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 552 | 914M USD | 64 | 44 | |
| 552 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score