Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EBAY · against 52 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #40 of 53 · scores higher than 25% of peers · safety percentile 14
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)7 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including EBAY · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | EBAY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 48 reported | 1.53× | 0.72× | 28% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 52 reported | 1.32 | 0.85 | 24% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 51 reported | 1.02× | 1.29× | 26% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.98T JPY (≈$27.1B) | 94 | 74 | |
| 2 | 5.71T JPY (≈$38.8B) | 93 | 82 | |
| 3 | 40.6B USD | 89 | 61 | |
| 4 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 87 | 75 | |
| 5 | 3.73T INR (≈$44.8B) | 87 | 64 | |
| 36 | 27.4B USD | 21 | 23 | |
| 37 | 89.1B AUD (≈$58.8B) | 19 | 41 | |
| 38 | 34.3B EUR (≈$37.7B) | 18 | 36 | |
| 39 | 84.3B USD | 15 | 53 | |
| 40 | 52.8B USD | 14 | 52 | |
| 41 | 283.2B SEK (≈$28.3B) | 13 | 41 | |
| 42 | 72.66T KRW (≈$52.3B) | 12 | 32 | |
| 43 | 77.5B USD | 10 | 26 | |
| 44 | 34.0B USD | 9 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score