Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EBAY · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #1,364 of 1,585 · scores higher than 14% of peers · safety percentile 14
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)158 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including EBAY · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | EBAY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 1.53× | 0.50× | 17% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 1.32 | 0.56 | 12% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 1.02× | 1.48× | 25% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 1,360 | 77.4B TWD (≈$2.4B) | 14 | 50 | |
| 1,361 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 359.4B JPY (≈$2.4B) |
| 14 |
| 33 |
| 1,362 | 227M NZD (≈$136M) | 14 | 27 |
| 1,363 | 2.3B EUR (≈$2.6B) | 14 | 53 |
| 1,364 | 52.8B USD | 14 | 52 |
| 1,365 | 5.8B EUR (≈$6.4B) | 14 | 48 |
| 1,366 | 363M GBP (≈$473M) | 14 | 51 |
| 1,367 | 42.5B BRL (≈$7.6B) | 14 | 45 |
| 1,368 | 418M USD | 14 | 53 |