Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to eBay Inc.
How eBay Inc. stacks up
EBAY · against 1,585 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Growth
68/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #501 of 1,586 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score158 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including EBAY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 68?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 5.2% vs peer median 4.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.5% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 83% of peers. Revenue growth: 14.7% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EBAY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EBAY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 14.7% | 3.7% | 83% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,125 reported | 5.2% | 4.1% | 52% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,578 reported | 6.5% | 4.3% | 60% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EBAY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 241M MYR (≈$53M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 501 | 3.98T JPY (≈$27.1B) | 68 | 74 | |
| 501 | 3.9B USD | 68 | 56 | |
| 501 | 2.8B USD | 68 | 55 | |
| 501 | 9.3B EUR (≈$10.2B) | 68 | 38 | |
| 501 | 52.8B USD | 68 | 52 | |
| 501 | 14.5B USD | 68 | 29 | |
| 501 | 6.5B EUR (≈$7.1B) | 68 | 49 | |
| 501 | 28.4B INR (≈$341M) | 68 | 60 | |
| 501 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 68 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score