Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EBAY · against 361 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #251 of 362 · scores higher than 31% of peers · safety percentile 14
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)62 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including EBAY · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | EBAY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 319 reported | 1.53× | 0.99× | 33% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 348 reported | 1.32 | 1.14 | 35% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 362 reported | 1.02× | 1.47× | 25% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 96 | 89 | |
| 2 | 499M USD | 95 | 72 | |
| 3 | 141M USD | 95 | 30 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 95 | 89 | |
| 5 | 283M USD | 94 | 48 | |
| 247 | 965M USD | 15 | 50 | |
| 248 | 2.7B USD | 15 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 249 | 1.2B USD | 15 | 33 |
| 250 | 13.7B USD | 14 | 54 |
| 251 | 52.8B USD | 14 | 52 |
| 252 | 418M USD | 14 | 53 |
| 253 | 1.8B USD | 14 | 46 |
| 254 | 378M USD | 13 | 26 |
| 255 | 1.3B USD | 13 | 44 |