Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PTLO · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #1,372 of 1,585 · scores higher than 13% of peers · safety percentile 13
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)158 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including PTLO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PTLO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 1.36× | 0.50× | 20% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 1.56 | 0.56 | 7% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 0.26× | 1.48× | 1% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 1,368 | 418M USD | 14 | 53 | |
| 1,369 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.8B USD |
| 14 |
| 46 |
| 1,370 | 120M MYR (≈$26M) | 14 | 30 |
| 1,371 | 570.7B JPY (≈$3.9B) | 14 | 55 |
| 1,372 | 378M USD | 13 | 26 |
| 1,373 | 7.8B SEK (≈$776M) | 13 | 11 |
| 1,374 | 900.9B JPY (≈$6.1B) | 13 | 46 |
| 1,375 | 1.3B USD | 13 | 44 |
| 1,376 | 283.2B SEK (≈$28.3B) | 13 | 41 |