Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DEA · against 183 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #125 of 184 · scores higher than 32% of peers · safety percentile 20
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)27 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including DEA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | DEA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 177 reported | 1.26× | 1.12× | 45% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 179 reported | 0.97 | 1.02 | 57% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 185 reported | 0.60× | 1.22× | 24% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 2 | 354M USD | 97 | 41 | |
| 3 | 2.5B USD | 97 | 88 | |
| 4 | 3.3B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 5 | 26.9B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 121 | 2.0B USD | 21 | 40 | |
| 122 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 3.5B USD |
| 21 |
| 59 |
| 123 | 2.8B USD | 21 | 37 |
| 124 | 62.3B USD | 21 | 49 |
| 125 | 1.1B USD | 20 | 43 |
| 126 | Unavailable | 20 | 31 |
| 127 | 11.7B USD | 18 | 49 |
| 128 | 905M USD | 18 | 19 |
| 129 | 681M USD | 18 | 52 |