Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CPT · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #613 of 751 · scores higher than 18% of peers · safety percentile 18
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including CPT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CPT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 1.26× | 0.82× | 26% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 0.81 | 0.69 | 41% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 0.35× | 1.20× | 16% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 609 | 384M CHF (≈$442M) | 19 | 53 | |
| 610 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 5.6B CNY (≈$781M) |
| 19 |
| 32 |
| 611 | 506M HKD (≈$65M) | 19 | 16 |
| 612 | 3.2B HKD (≈$415M) | 19 | 29 |
| 613 | 11.7B USD | 18 | 49 |
| 614 | 12.9B EUR (≈$14.2B) | 18 | 63 |
| 615 | 905M USD | 18 | 19 |
| 616 | 681M USD | 18 | 52 |
| 617 | 1.2B AUD (≈$811M) | 18 | 47 |