Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DEA · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #599 of 751 · scores higher than 20% of peers · safety percentile 20
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including DEA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | DEA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 1.26× | 0.82× | 26% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 0.97 | 0.69 | 28% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 0.60× | 1.20× | 27% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 595 | 2.8B USD | 21 | 37 | |
| 596 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 62.3B USD |
| 21 |
| 49 |
| 597 | 28.2B CNY (≈$3.9B) | 21 | 31 |
| 598 | 69.1B JPY (≈$470M) | 20 | 37 |
| 599 | 1.1B USD | 20 | 43 |
| 600 | 41.9B JPY (≈$285M) | 20 | 75 |
| 601 | Unavailable | 20 | 31 |
| 602 | 24M CAD (≈$18M) | 20 | 13 |
| 603 | 3.9B SEK (≈$386M) | 20 | 42 |