Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LTC · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #22 of 751 · scores higher than 97% of peers · safety percentile 97
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)76 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including LTC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LTC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 0.58× | 0.82× | 66% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 0.54 | 0.69 | 60% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 20.83× | 1.20× | 99% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 18 | 4.1B MYR (≈$906M) | 98 | 64 | |
| 19 | 35M MYR (≈$8M) | 98 | 37 | |
| 20 | 354M USD | 97 | 41 | |
| 21 | 3.0B CNY (≈$427M) | 97 | 61 | |
| 22 | 2.5B USD | 97 | 88 | |
| 23 | 3.3B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 24 | 128.0B JPY (≈$870M) | 97 | 87 | |
| 25 | 1.5B NZD (≈$896M) | 97 | 74 | |
| 26 | 26.9B USD | 97 | 78 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score