Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Canadian Natural Resources Limited
How Canadian Natural Resources Limited stacks up
CNQ · against 386 other Energy companies
Valuation
50/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #193 of 387 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score38 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including CNQ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 11.1% vs peer median 12.1%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.4% vs peer median 6.2%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 66% of peers. Earnings yield: 6.9% vs peer median 5.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CNQ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CNQ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | 7.6% | 5.8% | 66% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | 11.1% | 12.4% | 42% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | 6.4% | 6.0% | 54% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | 28.8% | 60.0% | 15% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CNQ| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 189 | 3.3B USD | 51 | 52 | |
| 189 | 21.2B EUR (≈$23.3B) | 51 | 48 | |
| 189 | 1.3B USD | 51 | 53 | |
| 189 | 5.8B EUR (≈$6.3B) | 51 | 43 | |
| 193 | 110.5B USD | 50 | 61 | |
| 193 | 2.1B USD | 50 | 65 | |
| 193 | 548M GBP (≈$712M) | 50 | 60 | |
| 196 | 1.5B USD | 49 | 50 | |
| 196 | 2.1B USD | 49 | 76 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score