Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Baytex Energy Corp.
How Baytex Energy Corp. stacks up
BTE · against 386 other Energy companies
Valuation
51/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #189 of 387 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score38 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including BTE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Energy peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -11.7% vs peer median 5.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.6% vs peer median 6.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 72% of peers. EBITDA yield: 17.7% vs peer median 12.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BTE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BTE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | Not reported | 5.8% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | 17.7% | 12.4% | 72% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | 5.6% | 6.0% | 46% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | 51.2% | 60.0% | 41% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BTE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 185 | 76.6B JPY (≈$521M) | 52 | 52 | |
| 185 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score