Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CNQ · against 398 other Energy companies
Ranked #273 of 399 · scores higher than 32% of peers · safety percentile 32
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including CNQ · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CNQ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 392 reported | 0.43× | 0.49× | 55% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 392 reported | 0.91 | 0.48 | 16% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 395 reported | 1.00× | 1.37× | 29% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 41M USD | 99 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 269 | 31.5B CNY (≈$4.4B) | 33 | 33 | |
| 270 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 108.0B USD |
| 32 |
| 55 |
| 271 | 186.0B BRL (≈$33.5B) | 32 | 41 |
| 272 | 9.2B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 32 | 14 |
| 273 | 110.5B USD | 32 | 61 |
| 274 | 900M USD | 31 | 56 |
| 275 | 5.3B USD | 31 | 11 |
| 276 | 1.78T JPY (≈$12.1B) | 31 | 58 |
| 277 | 26.1B NOK (≈$2.5B) | 31 | 51 |