Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to FLEX LNG Ltd.
How FLEX LNG Ltd. stacks up
FLNG · against 386 other Energy companies
Valuation
49/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #196 of 387 · scores higher than 49% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score39 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including FLNG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 49?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield and earnings yield, but weaker EBITDA yield than most Energy peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 73% of peers. EBITDA yield: 8.9% vs peer median 12.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 61% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.0% vs peer median 5.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 77% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 10.8% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FLNG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FLNG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | 7.0% | 5.8% | 61% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | 8.3% | 12.4% | 27% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | 10.8% | 6.0% | 77% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | 47.5% | 60.0% | 36% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FLNG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 189 | 5.8B EUR (≈$6.3B) | 51 | 43 | |
| 193 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score