Ranked #12 of 153 · scores higher than 93% of peers · safety percentile 85
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)
7 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including WILC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why “Lower relative risk”?
The measures below combine into a safety percentile of 85 among Consumer Defensive companies. It is relative: 67 or more is lower relative risk, 33–66 moderate, below 33 higher.
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
▼a share price that has swung more with the market: weaker than 96% of peers. Beta: 1.17 vs peer median 0.41
▲less borrowing relative to shareholders' equity: stronger than 93% of peers. Debt / equity: 0.01× vs peer median 0.42×
▲more short-term assets to cover bills due within a year: stronger than 98% of peers. Current ratio: 9.68× vs peer median 1.52×
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WILC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
