Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TR · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #151 of 802 · scores higher than 81% of peers · safety percentile 81
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)80 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including TR · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 0.01× | 0.44× | 91% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 0.41 | 0.32 | 39% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 2.89× | 1.53× | 79% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 147 | 162.4B CNY (≈$22.7B) | 82 | 81 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 148 | 5.3B BRL (≈$945M) | 82 | 67 |
| 149 | 73.2B JPY (≈$498M) | 82 | 73 |
| 150 | 293.3B CNY (≈$41.1B) | 81 | 54 |
| 151 | 2.9B USD | 81 | 55 |
| 152 | 48.9B JPY (≈$332M) | 81 | 69 |
| 153 | 9.0B TWD (≈$278M) | 81 | 75 |
| 154 | 6.0B CNY (≈$835M) | 81 | 51 |
| 155 | 531M HKD (≈$68M) | 81 | 73 |